Platform Comparison
Conferences.Center vs EasyChair
Conferences.Center brings AI-assisted setup, built-in ticketing, and a live event hub together with full peer review, so everything from submission to showtime lives in one platform. EasyChair is the long-established, widely trusted system for academic peer review at scale.
Comparison as of July 2026, based on publicly available information about EasyChair. Product capabilities and pricing change over time — verify current details with each vendor. Spot something out of date? Tell us and we’ll correct it.
The short version
Conferences.Center is an AI-assisted, all-in-one platform. It covers CFP, abstract, and full-paper submission and peer review, then extends into AI-assisted setup, built-in ticketing with Stripe-hosted payments where configured, and a live/hybrid event hub with Q&A, polls, and networking — so a whole conference runs from a single system.
EasyChair is one of the most widely used conference management systems in academia, especially in computer science. It has powered thousands of conferences and is known for its deep, reliable paper-submission and peer-review workflows — bidding, assignment, discussion, rebuttal, and proceedings.
If your only need is academic peer review, EasyChair is a proven choice. If you also sell tickets, run a live or hybrid program, and want a modern interface, an all-in-one platform can bring those pieces together in one place.
Feature-by-feature comparison
Conferences.Center vs EasyChair across the workflows that matter for running a conference.
| Capability | Conferences.Center | EasyChair |
|---|---|---|
| AI-assisted conference setup | Yes — AI-assisted setup can draft tracks, timelines, and workflows from a brief or CFP for organizer review. | Limited — configurable but manual setup; no AI-guided configuration as of 2026. |
| Abstract & paper submission | Yes — CFP, abstracts, and full papers with multi-track submission and format checks. | Yes — mature CFP, abstract, and full-paper submission; a core strength. |
| Peer review (blind, COI, rebuttal) | Yes — single- and double-blind review, conflict-of-interest checks, and structured rebuttal periods. | Yes — bidding, assignment, discussion, blind review, and rebuttal; deep and battle-tested. |
| Reviewer matching / suggestions | Yes — reviewer suggestions from roles, tracks, and workload; organizers approve every assignment. | Yes — reviewer bidding plus keyword/topic-based assignment. |
| Ticketing & payments | Yes — built-in ticketing with Stripe-hosted payments where configured. | Focused on submission and peer review rather than built-in ticketing, payment setup, or live delivery as of 2026. |
| Live / hybrid event hub | Yes — live/hybrid hub with agenda, Q&A, polls, and attendee access for online and in-person formats. | Centered on the review pipeline rather than live event delivery. |
| Attendee networking | Yes — attendee profiles, networking spaces, and meeting workflows, with assisted matching where configured. | Focused on peer review rather than attendee-engagement features. |
| Analytics | Yes — dashboards for submissions, reviews, registration, attendance, engagement, and revenue where configured. | Limited — review statistics and reports rather than event dashboards. |
| Data export & portability | Yes — structured exports across submissions, reviews, schedules, registrations, and attendees. | Yes — exports of submissions, reviews, and proceedings data. |
| Pricing model | Published per-event pricing from $290 for small events, with plans for larger or recurring conference programs. | Free for many academic conferences; paid tiers for additional features (varies by plan). |
| Best for | Teams that want submissions, peer review, scheduling, registration, attendee operations, and reporting in one platform. | Peer-review-heavy academic conferences, especially in computer science. |
Where a cell says “varies by plan”, “add-on”, or “limited”, availability depends on the vendor’s tier or is not a core focus of that product.
Where EasyChair is strong
EasyChair's reputation is earned. For committees whose central task is rigorous peer review, it offers one of the most complete and dependable pipelines available — reviewer bidding, conflict handling, multi-phase discussion, rebuttals, meta-reviews, and proceedings generation that many program chairs already know inside out.
It is also free or low-cost for a great many academic conferences, and its ubiquity in fields like computer science means reviewers and authors often already have accounts and know the workflow. That institutional familiarity is a genuine advantage that no comparison table fully captures.
Why teams choose Conferences.Center
One platform for peer review, ticketing, and the live event — instead of stitching several tools together.
Review, ticketing, and live in one place
Keep submissions, peer review, registration payments, and the live/hybrid program in a single platform instead of bolting EasyChair to separate ticketing and event apps.
AI-assisted setup
Describe your event and let AI-assisted setup scaffold tracks, timelines, and review workflows, cutting the manual configuration a fresh instance usually requires.
A modern, guided interface
Authors, reviewers, and organizers work in a clean, current UI designed for clarity, which lowers the support burden on your committee.
Ticketing and payment workflows
Sell tickets and collect registration fees where payments are enabled, with payment handling through Stripe-hosted checkout where configured.
Who should choose which
Choose EasyChair if…
your event is purely about academic peer review, your community already lives in EasyChair, and you handle ticketing and the live program with other tools (or don't need them).
Choose Conferences.Center if…
you want one platform for submission, peer review, ticketing, and a live/hybrid event — with AI-assisted setup and a modern interface for authors and reviewers.
Frequently asked questions
Is Conferences.Center good for academic conferences?
Yes. It supports CFP and abstract/paper submission, single- and double-blind review, conflict-of-interest checks, rebuttal periods, and reviewer suggestions — the core of an academic program committee's workflow — while also handling ticketing and the live event.
Does EasyChair handle ticketing and payments?
As of 2026, EasyChair is focused on the submission and peer-review pipeline rather than ticketing, payment setup, or live delivery. Conferences.Center includes built-in ticketing with Stripe-hosted payments where configured, so registration revenue lives alongside your program.
How does pricing compare?
EasyChair is free for many academic conferences, with paid tiers for additional capabilities that vary by plan. Conferences.Center uses transparent, published per-event pricing from $290 (no quote required), plus annual Organization plans for recurring programs. Compare current details on our pricing page and EasyChair's site before deciding.
Keep exploring
Compare with other platforms
See the conference-operations workflow
Review how Conferences.Center connects setup, submissions, peer review, registration, and live operations in one organizer workspace.